‘The governors of the Gulf Coast states, all Republicans, asked the federal government for help dealing with the BP oil spill – yeah, the government, the very organisation that their hero and mentor Ronald Reagan described as “the problem,” not the solution’, says United Steelworkers union (USW) international president Leo W Gerard.
Writing on the AFL-CIO website on Tuesday, Gerard added: ‘ “The problem” must deal with our oil problem, those Republicans told President Obama.
‘The president sent the help they requested, but at the same time, Republican mouthpieces like House GOP Conference Chairman Mike Pence (Ind.) accused the administration of responding too slowly to the spill.
‘Republicans believe government should be shrunk so small it can be downed in a bathtub, that government should get out of the way and allow private enterprise to work.
‘But, simultaneously, they want government to clean up a catastrophe created by private industry.
‘Twenty-nine dead coal miners in West Virginia, seven dead workers at an oil refinery in Washington State and eleven dead on a Gulf of Mexico oil rig followed by an ecological calamity, all in the span of a month, illustrate in blood the need for more regulation and stiffer enforcement.
‘That is more government, not less. And it is government performing an essential basic role – protecting its citizens and preserving the environment in which they live.
‘Improving regulation and enforcement may cost money.
‘But then, what is the value of the lives of those 47 workers killed in three workplace explosions in one month?
‘What is the value of the oil-polluted Gulf waters and coastline? What is the value of untold oil-suffocated marine animals?
‘As the oil slick sloshed closer to the Florida coast, Sunshine State Republican Marco Rubio, a candidate for the US Senate, said of the clean-up by BP, which owns the oil-gushing underwater well, “I would prefer BP pay all of it, but ultimately I don’t even know if they have the resources to do that . . . they’re going to have to pay a significant chunk of this.”
‘Who does Tea-Party-darling Rubio suggest pay the remaining chunk?
‘Taxpayers, of course. He is saying taxpayers should bail out BP, just as they did the too-big-to-fail banks when they got themselves in trouble.
‘Too many taxpayers bought the Republican mantra that regulation is excessively costly for both business and government.
‘Congress repealed banking regulations, then, Wall Street gambling imploded the US economy.
‘Now, after that painful fact, Congress is trying to re-regulate banking.
‘It is so much cheaper to regulate and enforce than to pay for clean-ups.
‘Just like banking, that’s true for industry, which has repeatedly shown it can’t or won’t regulate itself.
‘And clearly the free market fails to regulate business behaviour, or Republican Rubio wouldn’t need to propose taxpayers bear costs of a corporate-caused catastrophe in the Gulf of Mexico.
‘BP is a perfect example. In March 2005, an explosion at the BP refinery in Texas City, Texas, killed 15 workers and injured 170 more.
‘Afterward, a study showed that one of the best ways to prevent catastrophes such as fires and explosions is a method called “process safety management.”
‘Rather than counting slips and falls, process safety uses engineering and management techniques to constantly ensure that machinery and piping are in good condition, to meticulously record changes on refinery units, to properly train workers and to carefully schedule work to prevent fatigue.
‘It also refers to an Occupational Health and Safety Administration (OSHA) standard governing refineries.
‘OSHA launched a programme in June of 2007 to emphasise process safety, and in the first year completed 20 inspections and issued 456 citations to refiners. “We were pretty shocked and dismayed by what we found,” said OSHA enforcement director Richard Fairfax.
‘These refineries knew about this programme. Still they violated the regulations.
‘Then an explosion at the Tesoro refinery in Anacortes, Washington, killed seven workers on April 2.
Eighteen days later, an explosion in the Gulf of Mexico killed eleven workers at a well owned by BP.
‘There was BP again, five years after the catastrophe at the Texas City refinery.
‘This corporation didn’t regulate itself. The “invisible hand of the market” didn’t do it either.
‘And let’s get something straight. These were not natural disasters, not earthquakes like in Haiti or hurricanes like Katrina. These are man-made disasters.
‘And just as important, God didn’t have a hand in these catastrophes.
‘Don Blankenship, the CEO of Massey Energy, which owns the West Virginia mine that exploded, and Texas Gov. Rick Perry, a Republican, both suggested the Lord’s wrath was at work.
‘Perry said both the oil rig and coal mine explosions were “an act of God.”
‘That would mean Massey and BP are not responsible.
‘In the corporations-are-good and government-is-bad fantasy world where Blankenship and Perry live, society can’t hold corporations accountable because God is to blame.
‘Just like these Republicans, the American Petroleum Institute (API), which represents both drillers and refiners, does not believe in regulation.
‘Ron Chittim, API senior policy adviser, told the San Antonio Express-News that no new regulation is necessary because the industry already must obey too many rules.
‘After the explosion at BP in Texas City, the United Steelworkers (USW) union, which represents oil and refinery workers, met with API and the oil industry in an attempt to write new safety guidelines.
‘USW Vice President Gary Beevers abandoned the effort because he felt the industry was more concerned about image than safety.
‘Now, the USW is pressing Congress for stronger safety regulations and fines high enough to actually affect corporate behaviour.
‘As this year of fatal explosions has tragically illustrated, less government is a problem. More regulation is the solution.’
l The United Steelworkers (USW) said it is pleased by the National Mediation Board (NMB) announcement on Monday that it has amended union election procedures in the airline and rail industry.
The new rules replace procedures that required a majority of workers to vote just to validate a union election.
‘The amended procedure announced today will make elections far more fair and much more democratic,’ said USW International President Leo W. Gerard.
‘Airline and rail workers deserve a proper opportunity – one that is consistent with democratic norms – to elect collective bargaining representation.’
The proposed rule change received widespread support, with 39 Senators, 179 Democratic House Members and 13 Republican House Members having written letters of support.
In addition, the Center for American Progress, American Rights at Work, and national, state and local unions provided support.
Under the old rules, when a worker didn’t participate in an election, a ‘no’ vote was recorded.
This procedure often encouraged voter suppression, because companies could prevent unions from forming by encouraging workers to not participate in the election.
With Monday’s change, only workers who cast a vote will be counted.
