Black Schoolgirl Was Strip-Searched By Met Police

0
241
protester at a demonstration in parliament Square against the Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill two days after the vigil for Sarah Everard was attacked by Met police

A BLACK schoolgirl was strip-searched by police after being wrongly suspected of carrying cannabis.

The ‘traumatic’ search by Metropolitan Police officers took place without another adult present at the girl’s secondary school in Hackney in 2020.
A safeguarding report on the incident concluded it was unjustified and racism was ‘likely’ to have been a factor.
Scotland Yard said the officers’ actions were ‘regrettable’ and it ‘should never have happened’.
According to the report, the impact on the pupil – referred to as Child Q – was ‘profound’ and the repercussions ‘obvious and ongoing’.
Family members described her as changing from a ‘happy-go-lucky girl to a timid recluse that hardly speaks’, who now self-harms and needs therapy.
Police were called to a school in Hackney at the end of 2020 by teachers who told investigators they had been concerned the teenager had drugs in her possession because she smelt of cannabis.
She was taken to the medical room and strip-searched by two female officers, while teachers remained outside.
During the ordeal her intimate body parts were exposed and she was made to take off her sanitary towel, according to the review. No drugs were found.
Her family strongly believe the strip search was a racist incident, and the review found her experiences are ‘unlikely to have been the same’ had she not been black.
The Local Child Safeguarding Practice Review, published in March, was conducted by City & Hackney Safeguarding Children Partnership (CHSCP)000000.
It said it was highly likely that ‘adultification bias’ was a factor – where adults perceive black children as being older than they are because they see them as more ‘streetwise’.
In a written statement to the review, the girl said she wanted everyone who allowed the strip search to happen to ‘be held responsible’.
She said: ‘I need to know that the people who have done this to me can’t do it to anyone else ever again, in fact so no-one else can do this to any other child in their care.’
Investigators also found that school staff deferred to the police’s authority and ‘should have been more challenging’.
This has been accepted by the school, with one staff member saying: ‘I have never known, nor would I condone, a strip-search of a young person on a school site.’
The Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) was now investigating, the Met confirmed.
Det Supt Dan Rutland, of the Met’s Central East Command, said: ‘We recognise that the findings of the safeguarding review reflect this incident should never have happened.
‘It is truly regrettable and on behalf of the Met Police I would like to apologise to the child concerned, her family and the wider community.’
Mayor of London Sadiq Khan said this was a ‘deeply disturbing case’ and he would be ‘closely following’ the IOPC review.

  • Two serving Met police constables and an ex-officer have denied sharing grossly offensive messages with Sarah Everard’s killer Wayne Couzens.

PC Jonathon Cobban, 35, PC William Neville, 33, and former officer Joel Borders, 45, appeared at Westminster Magistrates’ Court accused of the offences between April and August 2019.
Couzens, 49, murdered Sarah Everard last year while serving as a Met officer.
All three defendants were released on bail and a trial was set for 28 July.
PC Cobban, of Didcot, Oxfordshire, is charged with five counts of sending a grossly offensive, indecent, obscene or menacing message on a public electronic communications network, while PC Neville, of Weybridge, Surrey, is charged with two counts of the same offence.
Former Met officer Borders, of Preston, Lancashire, also faces five counts of the same charge.
The alleged offences took place two years before Couzens kidnapped Sarah Everard in a fake arrest in March 2021, before raping and the murdering the 33-year-old marketing executive.
The Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) previously said the charges arose from an investigation into the phone records of Couzens.
In court, the three spoke only to confirm their names, addresses and dates of birth and to enter not guilty pleas to each of the charges, during a hearing lasting about 20 minutes.
The Met said the serving officers had been suspended from duty.