Thousands Of Tunisian Workers March For The Restoration Of Parliament And Democracy

0
81
Demonstrators outside the Presidential Palace in Tunis confront police

ON SUNDAY, thousands of Tunisian workers and youth rallied on the streets of the capital, Tunis, to demand that President Kais Saied restore the parliament and normal democratic rule.

Saied launched a coup and seized nearly all powers on July 25, suspending the parliament and dismissing the government before installing a new prime minister and announcing he could rule by decree.

However, the secretary-general of Tunisia’s powerful General Labour Union (UGTT) has said the parliament Said ‘suspended’ should not be reinstated, and instead fresh legislative elections should be held.

In remarks on Sunday, Noureddine Taboubi said he was reiterating the UGTT’s stance which urged Tunisians not to reinstate parliament.

He had previously stated that Tunisians had suffered from the actions of the now-frozen parliament.

According to Taboubi, in a phone call he had with Saied following Sunday’s anti-government protests, the president was ‘open’ and ‘listening’ to find a solution to the ongoing crisis.

Taboubi said it is essential for the government to review the country’s electoral law to hold legislative elections as soon as possible, claiming: ‘We have the ability to find solutions through meaningful and calm dialogue.’

UGTT, which has about one million members, called last week for a judicial investigation after a demonstrator died from inhaling tear gas fired by police to disperse protests against the reopening of a landfill site in Aguereb.

Thousands of Tunisians protesting against President Saied’s power grab tried to march on the suspended parliament on Sunday, as hundreds of police blocked off the area.

Protesters briefly clashed with police as they tried to remove barriers near the chamber and demanded that Saied restore parliament and normal democratic rule.

Protesters chanted ‘Shut down Kais Saied’ and ‘Freedom! Freedom! End the police state!’ as they pulled down barriers obstructing the roads leading to the parliament building at the capital’s Bardo palace.

The demonstrators ‘shut down all the streets, the avenues, the motorways’, Jawhar Ben Mbarek, a left-wing political activist told reporters.

‘After shutting down the state, Saied has shut down the institutions, the constitution. He has shut down the country.’

Social media users shared images of police using cars and mini-vans to block protesters from reaching the suburb of Bardo, where the parliament building is located.

Several members of the Islamist Ennahdha party, a key force in the dissolved parliament, were at the forefront of the procession alongside left-wing representatives, holding signs reading: ‘MPs against the coup.’

Other protesters gathered near parliament, Tunisian flags in hand, and shouted their opposition to military trials for civilians.

Sunday’s protest was the latest rally opposing Saied’s 25 July decision to sack the government, suspend parliament and seize an array of powers, citing an ‘imminent threat’ to the country – birthplace of the Arab Spring uprisings against autocracy.

The latest violence followed clashes last week between police and protesters in the southern town of Agareb, in which one person was killed.

Saied, who was elected in late 2019, made his shock move in July amid a socio-economic crisis aggravated by the Covid-19 pandemic.

On Wednesday, 10 November, civil rights group Amnesty International warned in a statement: ‘Military courts in Tunisia are increasingly targeting civilians, in some cases for publicly criticising President Kais Saied since he claimed sweeping new powers on 25 July.

‘In the past three months alone, the military justice system has investigated or prosecuted at least ten civilians for a range of offences.’

The organisation highlighted four cases where civilians have been brought before the military justice system simply for criticising the president; television presenter Amer Ayad; MPs Abdellatif Aloui and Yassine Ayari and Facebook activist Slim Jebali.

Heba Morayef, Amnesty International’s Regional Director for the Middle East and North Africa, said: ‘Civilians should never be tried in military courts, yet in Tunisia, the number of civilians brought before the military justice system appears to be increasing at an alarming rate.

‘In the past three months alone, more civilians have faced military courts than did in the preceding ten years.

‘In four cases, civilians are facing military courts simply for peacefully expressing opinions critical of the government.

‘As Tunisians debate the uncertain future of their country, it is more important than ever that authorities protect their right to do so freely – even when deemed “insulting” – without fear of persecution.’

On 22 September, President Saied issued Decree Law 117, which suspends all but two chapters and the preamble of Tunisia’s constitution, granting the president control of most aspects of governance, including the right to legislate through decrees, and to regulate media, civil society and courts.

The authorities initially imposed at least 11 arbitrary house arrests on some members of parliament and former officials but subsequently lifted them in all 11 cases.

Military trials

of civilians

Between 2011 and 2018, human rights groups documented at least six cases of civilians brought before the military justice system; this number has been exceeded in the past three months alone.

The civilians currently facing military courts include six members of parliament from the Al Karama party, including Abdellatif Aloui, along with lawyer Mehdi Zagrouba.

Anouar Ouled Ali, who heads the men’s legal defence team, told Amnesty International that they are being investigated in connection with an altercation with police at Tunis international airport on 15 March 2021.

They are facing charges relating to public disorder, threatening state security, and impeding or insulting public officials in the course of their work.

While some of these charges relate to recognisable offences under international law, civilians facing such charges should do so in a civilian, not a military, court.

Tunisia’s Code of Military Justice allows the military justice system to try civilians in specific circumstances.

Article 91 of the Military Code of Justice mandates prison terms for military personnel or civilians who carry out public acts that denigrate the flag or the army or criticise the actions of military leadership or undermine its dignity.

Tunisian law grants the president final control over the appointment of judges and prosecutors in the military court system, based on nominations by the defence and justice ministers.

As a result, military courts lack independence. Under international human rights law civilians should never be brought before military courts, no matter what the charges against them.

Guidelines from the African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights, which is mandated to interpret the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights, of which Tunisia is a state party, state that military courts should not ‘in any circumstances whatsoever have jurisdiction over civilians.’

Arrested after criticism

On 3rd October, police from the National Brigade to Fight Criminality arrested television presenter Ayad and parliamentarian Aloui from their homes in the cities of Monastir and Tunis respectively, two days after they had appeared together on Ayad’s debate programme, Hassad 24.

During the broadcast both men had made remarks critical of President Saied and voiced scepticism about the degree of meaningful authority granted to Najla Bouden, whom Saied had recently appointed to head Tunisia’s new government.

Ayad also quoted from a poem by Iraqi poet Ahmad Matar about an imaginary satirical dialogue between the poet and a dictator.

For his part, Aloui said that President Saied’s recent moves should be considered a ‘coup’ and debated as such.

Amnesty International has reviewed a video of the programme, made available online by its private broadcaster, Zitouna TV.

The organisation found that neither Aloui nor Ayad had made statements which seemed to constitute discriminatory language or incitement to violence, or which otherwise went beyond peaceful political criticism as protected by international law.

Lawyer Malek Ben Amor, who represents both men and was present during the police’s initial interrogation of Ayad, told Amnesty International that the police’s questions focused on Ayad’s statements during the 1st October broadcast.

Police showed Ben Amor an order from a military prosecutor’s office to investigate the two men in connection with the broadcast, he said.

On 5th October, an investigative judge at the Military Court of First Instance in Tunis remanded Ayad to prison and provisionally released Aloui pending their investigation under Penal Code Article 67, which mandates a fine and prison term for offence against the president, as well as Articles 72 and 128 of the Penal Code and Article 91 of the Military Code of Justice.

Another member of parliament, Yassine Ayari, is facing trial on 22 November on charges including harming the dignity of the army and offence against the president.

The charges are based on Facebook posts in which Ayari had called the 25 July decision to suspend the parliament ‘a military coup with foreign planning and coordination,’ and used words such as ‘Pharaoh’ and ‘silly’ to describe the president.

On 13 October, a military court in the city of El Kef sentenced activist Slim Jebali to one year in prison on charges including insulting the president and harming the dignity of the army.

Defence lawyer Amor Raoueni told Amnesty International that the conviction was based on Jebali’s Facebook posts in which he denounced Saied’s concentration of powers since 25 July.

Under Article 19 of the ICCPR, Tunisia is obligated to protect freedom of expression by refraining from punishing anyone for criticism or perceived disrespect toward public figures, leaders, and institutions.

Guidance on implementing the ICCPR from the United Nations Human Rights Council notes that even ‘insult to a public figure’ is to be considered protected speech.