FBU condemns plan for firefighters to be sent into fires with breathing equipment turned off

Firefighters, local residents and campaigners at the most recent Grenfell Silent March on June 14th

THE Fire Brigades Union has formally reported two fire and rescue services to the Health and Safety Executive (HSE), and identified several others, in relation to bringing in a policy which would see firefighters sent into fires with their breathing equipment turned off, in a letter first published on Friday.

The policy change involves instructing firefighters to go beyond the point of safe air with their breathing equipment turned off in high-rise building fires, in a move which the union say breaks health and safety law.
The policy had previously been struck down in London, by the fire service’s health and safety advisory panel, due to being unsafe.
The letter calls for the HSE to ‘investigate our complaint and use its statutory powers to bring an end’ to this policy.
Hampshire & Isle of Wight and Dorset & Wiltshire fire and rescue services have both brought in the change.
Riccardo la Torre, Fire Brigades Union national officer, said: ‘This procedure is unsafe, unlawful and unprofessional, and puts firefighters and the public at greater risk.
‘It tears up half a century of health and safety law, best practice guidance, manufacturers’ instructions, and firefighter training.
‘It will not make living and working in high rise buildings safer or tackle the wider crisis in building safety. It simply puts firefighters and residents at greater risk.
‘Those chiefs imposing this policy have worked harder to take the breathing masks off of firefighters’ faces than they have to get flammable cladding off of people’s homes.
‘It is scarcely believable that the recent fire and rescue white paper appears to propose giving fire and rescue chiefs more power over decisions such as these, and reducing workers’ voices. Some fire and rescue chiefs simply cannot be trusted to get vital decisions like these right.
‘The policy aims to push firefighters beyond the duration of a breathing set. Let’s be clear, that means placing firefighters beyond the point of rescue if they become injured or trapped. Fire bosses would do well to remember that the safety procedures they are ripping up exist for a reason.
‘They were born from the death and injury of firefighters. The NFCC and local fire services need to do the right thing and turn their backs on this policy.
‘Following the IARC categorisation of the profession as class 1 carcinogenic, the highest level of certainty, it’s nothing less than scandalous that the NFCC continue with attempts to remove the very PPE that helps protect firefighters from that risk. Firefighters aren’t cannon fodder and don’t deserve to be treated as such.’
Firefighters are to turn on their breathing apparatus only if a gas monitor alarm is activated, and return to ‘clean air’.
But in their letter to the HSE the union says this is far too late, contradicts all expert advice and doesn’t allow firefighters time to don their breathing apparatus or escape to safety. The NFCC first introduced this policy, which has not been removed despite the London ruling.
The policy contradicts health and safety laws including the Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974, the Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999, and the Control of Substances Hazardous to Health Regulations 2002.
In addition to the risk of injury and death presented by rapid fire spread and irrespirable air, recent studies by Prof Anna Stec and the University of Central Lancashire warn of putting on BA too late, or taking off too early, which increases the risk of firefighters contracting cancer and diseases.
The International Agency for Research on Cancer, an intergovernmental agency forming part of the World Health Organization, earlier this month recognised for the first time that occupational exposure in firefighting is carcinogenic.
The Fire Brigades Union, which represents the majority of firefighters across the UK, argues that this policy is dangerous because:

  • Rapid expansions of fire may mean that firefighters cannot turn on breathing equipment before they are overwhelmed
  • Breathing apparatus are designed to be started in clean air conditions, with manufacturer instructions and user manuals making this clear
  • Any faults with BA sets may only be discovered when they have been started and firefighters are in the middle of the fire
  • Firefighters may breathe in toxic gases that are difficult to detect, such as carbon monoxide
  • Changing conditions may mean firefighters with their breathing equipment off may end up beyond the point later firefighters (with their own breathing equipment time-limited) can reach to rescue them
  • The union is also concerned that its officer members who are made to implement the policy could be subject to criminal charges, due to health and safety law breaches

Meanwhile, many Suffolk firefighters are receiving less money than they should in their pay packets due to a faulty computer system.
The fire and rescue service has had the issue brought to their attention by the Fire Brigades Union but has not resolved it.
In April 2021 the fire and rescue service moved from the iTrent payment system to Oracle Fusion. Issues began arising with firefighters’ payslips including multiple deductions being made for pension payments, payments and deductions for the same figure, deductions taken for the wrong pension scheme, incomprehensible payslips stretching over three pages in some cases, and incorrect holiday pay calculations.
The issue is widespread throughout the service, with at one point 1,400 unpaid claims issues having been reported by on-call firefighters – of whom there are only around 400.
In one example four duplicate pension deductions of £346.62 were made to an individual, meaning the firefighter’s pay was £1039.86 lower than it should have been for that month – a deduction of over 50%, when it should be 12.9%.
In another example a payslip was issued which was indecipherable to the extent that mortgage providers have not accepted it for calculating borrowing amounts.
The fire and rescue service have been aware of the problems since April 2021, and promised it would be resolved in the May 2022 payslips. This has not transpired, with issues present to the same extent as before according to the Fire Brigades Union.
Phil Johnston, Fire Brigades Union Suffolk brigade chair, said: ‘It is disgusting that Suffolk Fire and Rescue Service has not resolved this issue, especially given we are now in a cost of living crisis. Suffolk Fire and Rescue Service cannot claim to be looking after their people whilst this drags on.
‘No decent employer would leave their employees this far out of pocket due to administrative errors, and potentially facing difficulties paying mortgages, buying food for their families, and more.
‘It’s completely unacceptable and it needs to be resolved immediately.’