Workers Revolutionary Party

1,700 GPs quit in six years

March led by GPs in Tower Hamlets in East London to save the St Katherine Docks Practice

THE NHS’ latest GP workforce data for England has shown a drop of more than 1,700 full-time GPs – in the last six years.

And in response to the most recent publication of England’s GP workforce statistics, Dr Krishna Kasaraneni – the BMA GPs committee’s executive team member – has said: ‘Today, we still have around 300 fewer full-time equivalent, fully-qualified GPs in England than we had a year ago, even with the extra 100 on last month.
‘And since 2015, when ministers first began making promises about increasing GP numbers, England has lost the equivalent of more than 1,700 full-time, fully-qualified GPs.
For those left, the average number of patients each GP is responsible for has increased by around 300 – or 15% – over the same period.
‘Most notably, between September 2020 and the same month this year, more than 900 GP partners have quit or retired.
While new doctors may (choose) general practice, this is not keeping up with the high numbers of GPs leaving or reducing their hours in the face of unsustainable, unsafe workloads and rising hostility against the profession.
‘Meanwhile, confusing and damaging pension taxation rules that punish senior doctors for working more are a barrier to their ability to provide care to patients – something the Chancellor failed to address in the recent Spending Review.
Rather than merely recognising that they are way behind their target, ministers must do something tangible . . . and take meaningful steps to retain GPs who have spent the last 20 months going above and beyond in the face of the pandemic.
‘They need to listen to and work with GPs on the ground to reach solutions that support family doctors – without doing so they risk losing far more and the situation for patients getting far, far worse.’

NHS North Central London (NCL) CCG, which covers a population of 1.6 million patients, said this would avoid ‘unnecessary’ patient visits and reduce ‘inappropriate referrals’. The trusts include both the Royal Free London Hospitals and University College London Hospital (UCLH) NHS foundation trusts.
A&G involves GPs accessing specialist advice by telephone or IT platforms, rather than referring patients for a hospital investigation. But GP leaders have warned that any measures leading to GPs facing rejected referrals and therefore more ‘unresourced’ work and greater medico-legal risk are ‘unacceptable’.
Pulse has learned that NHS North Central London CCG is currently procuring an ambitious new A&G service to connect GPs and hospital specialists via calls and text messages across the area, with the successful provider to be measured against ‘key metrics’, including downgrading 65% of GP referrals.
A service specification, seen by Pulse, said that the ‘percentage of calls avoiding a referral/hospital admission’ and the ‘percentage of messages avoiding a referral’ should both be ‘at least 65%’.
Meanwhile, the procurement notice for the new contract, published last month, said it is expected to begin on 1 April 2022 with a ‘possible deadline for delivery’ of 31 March 2027.
The CCG said the procurement follows a successful A&G pilot during the Covid pandemic. ‘Evidence has shown that approximately 60% of calls avoid a referral or an admission to a specialist service,’ it added.
The procurement notice for the new service specified ‘a digital platform to enable both telephone-based and clinically secure photo messaging application for the provision of clinical advice and guidance for a range of clinical specialties.’
The documents said it must:

GPs will have ‘improved patient management including patient episodes concluding with no follow-up work and case-based learning’, while consultants will see a ‘reduction in inappropriate referrals’ and in ‘the number of written requests for advice that require responses’, it said.
Meanwhile, patients will gain ‘improved access to the clinical care pathway’, an ‘avoidance of unnecessary patient visits to hospital’ and a reduction in ‘follow-up visits to GP practices’, it added.
And, in response to medico-legal concerns, calls will be ‘recorded as highly-encrypted, information-governed digital files which provide a medico-legal record that is available to the relevant GP practice and hospital team’, the service specification said.
It will be up to GPs to ‘discuss/agree’ this with their patient ahead of the call or message, explaining that the advice will be stored as part of their medical record.
Following each A&G call, GPs will be asked to ‘rank’ the outcome, while the consultant will receive a text message asking them for ‘their view of the call outcome’ where GPs ‘fail to rank a call’. ‘At least 90%’ of GP feedback on the service should be ‘good or very good’, said the specification.
The news comes as another major hospital trust, in East London, has launched a trial requiring GPs to use A&G services before referring patients, with the potential for this to become a permanent measure. It also comes as NHS England has already set an A&G target across the country in a bid to curb GP referrals to hospitals, which requires GPs to use A&G for 12 out of 100 outpatient attendances by March next year.
Medical Defence Union (MDU) medico-legal adviser Dr Ed Nandasoma told Pulse that GPs are responsible for ensuring any referral – including via A&G – includes clear and appropriate information, while consultants are responsible for deciding what action is taken.
Any GP making a referral – via A&G or any other route – will be responsible for ensuring that appropriate information is included in the referral and that the matter on which advice or guidance is being sought is clearly communicated.
‘The responding clinician will be responsible for reviewing the information provided and taking a decision as to whether to offer advice, ask further questions if more information is required, seek the referrer’s agreement to convert the A&G request to a referral or to suggest an alternative route of care where that is more appropriate.’
However, Dr Nandasoma added that GPs who are ‘concerned that their patient may not be seen as soon as they might have been in the past’ should consider communicating ‘clearly’ in the referral if there are ‘urgent clinical concerns’.
They should also consider ‘explaining to patients the timescale in which a response is expected’ and ‘giving and documenting clear and specific safety netting advice on what the patient should do if their condition deteriorates’.
Medicolegal consultant at Medical Protection Society (MPS) Dr Karen Ellison told Pulse that practices must ensure patients ‘do not slip through the net’ and that they have ‘accurate and clear documentation’ in place for use in any medicolegal defence.
She said: ‘It is vital for practices to ensure that there are reliable systems in place to follow up on referrals so that patients do not slip through the net. The cornerstone of any medico-legal defence is an accurate and clear documentation, which often may need to be relied upon years after the consultation or clinical incident.’

Exit mobile version