The following letter was presented to President Mahmud Abbas’s office on behalf of 78 Palestinian organisations on Wednesday September 24, 2008, the Badil Resource Center for Palestinian Residency and Refugee Rights (Palestine) has confirmed.
It stressed: ‘Note that ALL Palestinian political factions have signed on as well.’
Open Letter to President Mahmud Abbas
Chair of the Palestine Liberation Organisation Executive Committee
President of the Palestinian National Authority
CC:
League of Arab States
Non-Aligned Movement
Organisation of the Islamic Conference
Re: The Rights of Palestinian Refugees and the Final Status Negotiations
‘Dear Mr President,
‘Greetings of Return,
‘We, the undersigned Palestinian refugee organisations, civil society movements and institutions in the Palestinian homeland and in exile are national organisations working to defend the right of return.
‘We appeal to you now because we are convinced that the alignment of the official Palestinian position and the position of the Palestinian people with regards to the final status negotiation issues is of the highest priority.
‘Foremost among these issues is the cause of the Palestinian refugees.
‘We are convinced that the alignment of popular and official positions is the main guarantee of a strong Palestinian position in the current negotiation process, which is taking place in a local, regional and global context that jeopardises the national rights of the Palestinian people.
‘In this context, we are concerned in particular about the rights of Palestinian refugees and internally displaced persons to return to their original lands and properties, restitution of their homes, lands and properties and compensation for damages incurred over the past 60 years.
‘Based on the fact that all of these rights are guaranteed under international law, and based on our awareness of the enormous pressures faced by Palestinian negotiators and the tactics of negotiations, such as secrecy with regards to the negotiation proceedings, we call upon you to adopt a negotiation strategy that is based on openness with the entirety of the Palestinian people – irrespective of their current place of residence – regarding all aspects and details of the negotiation process.
‘Implementation of the Palestinian refugees’ right of return was and continues to be the main purpose for which the Palestine Liberation Organisation (PLO) was established, a purpose which forms the central pillar of the PLO’s legitimacy as the sole legitimate representative of the Palestinian people.
‘Transparency and candidness of our representatives with all sectors of our society will guarantee that our rights are best defended, and strengthen our position in the face of enormous pressures.
‘It has been clear at all stages of the negotiations that this process aims to eliminate the core issue of the Arab/Palestinian struggle for freedom and justice: the Palestinian refugees and their rights of return and restitution.
‘In fact, elimination of these central Palestinian/Arab demands form the centre-piece of both Israeli and US policies.
‘It is also no secret that during the so-called “Oslo Peace Process” these policies have employed insidious tactics in order to nullify these rights altogether.
‘Such tactics include attempts to substitute the return and restitution of the refugees with monetary compensation; to reduce the number of those entitled to exercise these rights from over seven million Palestinian refugees and internally displaced persons to a tiny minority, including so-called “hardship cases” that would be arbitrarily defined by Israel; to suggest that the refugees return to homes located in the areas administered by the Palestinian Authority; and other humiliating “trade offs” whereby Palestinians are expected to surrender the right of refugees to return to homes, lands and properties of origin in exchange for other rights and demands, such as self-determination, borders, the reclamation of Jerusalem and removal of the illegal settlement-colonies.
‘The Palestinian leadership has rejected such degrading bargaining tactics in previous negotiations, notably those known as the second Camp David summit and the Clinton initiative.
‘The late President Yasser Arafat rejected these tactics, and he was made to pay for that with his liberty and his life.
‘Whereas the rights of return, restitution and compensation are enshrined in international law and specifically affirmed in UN General Assembly Resolution 194 and UN Security Council Resolution 237.
‘Whereas we see that increasing US pressure aims to force Palestinian negotiators to agree to an obscure framework for a solution that is to be achieved by any means and at the soonest date, and that such a framework is largely for internal US consumption in the context of a US Presidential election.
‘Whereas it has become clear that the US administration is working on other fronts to market its obscure framework for a solution in the September 2008 session of the UN General Assembly.
‘Whereas we realise, as a result of our movement’s long and difficult experience with Israeli politics, that Israeli political actors seek to solve the internal Israeli political crisis by venting destruction on the Palestinian front through various policies and practices, all of which work to entrench Israeli occupation, colonialism, and apartheid, and aim to attain international recognition of Israel as a “Jewish State”.
‘Whereas Western and Israeli election platforms must not be employed to put pressure on the Palestinian negotiators, who should in no way be a party to the political manoeuvres of US and Israeli political candidates, particularly in order to protect the legality, legitimacy and sanctity of Palestinian national rights regardless of who emerges victorious in foreign elections.
‘Whereas we perceive the retreat of the once principled European position, and the transformation of this position into one that conforms to the US policy of total complicity and support for Israel.
‘Whereas we clearly see the weakness and inability of the Arab countries to take action or play any effective role.
‘Whereas we witness the sharp, painful and unprecedented deterioration in the internal Palestinian political arena.
‘Whereas it has become plain and obvious that powerful external pressures aim to annul Palestinian refugee rights, particularly the right to return to their original lands and properties and the restitution of these lands and properties.
‘Whereas Israel and the US, according to Israeli officials, are intensifying their efforts to reach a framework for a solution that is acceptable to both Israel and the US and will be viable regardless of the ruling party.
‘Whereas the primary measure of the legitimacy of any solution remains the extent to which it will lead to the exercise of the right of self-determination by the Palestinian people, including foremost the right of Palestinian refugees to choose to return to their original homes and lands regardless of their current place of refuge,
‘We approach you with this statement based on our strong desire to chart a way forward that is built on the highest levels of clarity and candidness with the Palestinian people; a way forward that aims to strengthen the Palestinian position in this sensitive stage of the Palestinian struggle; a way forward that ensures that any framework for a solution will include the following principles in clear and immutable language.
‘The rights of Palestinian refugees and internally displaced persons to return, restitution and compensation are fundamental rights under international law and relevant UN resolutions – particularly UN General Assembly Resolution 194 and UN Security Council Resolution 237.
‘The content of these rights is non-negotiable irrespective of the manner in which they will be exercised.
‘The right of return is an individual right held by every Palestinian refugee and internally displaced person.
‘This right is passed on from one generation to the next, based on the individual’s choice on whether or not to return, an inalienable and indivisible right, and not affected by any bilateral, multilateral, or international treaty or agreement.
‘Any such agreement must respect the fundamental precepts and principles of international law.
‘The right of Palestinian refugees and internally displaced persons to return is a collective right that is not limited to one group or another, and it is an integral part of the Palestinian right of self-determination.
‘The right of Palestinian refugees and internally displaced persons to return is not subject to referendum.
‘May you remain steadfast in our struggle for freedom and dignity.’